About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-213842 1 (1984-05-15)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadlrw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                          THEU COMPTROLLER SENENRAL
  OEOIIION                 OP THE UNITEO STATES
                           WASHINGTON. 0      C. 30540



  pLSON!-213842                 OATE: May 15, 1984
  MATTER OF: Overnite Transportation Company--

               Reconsideration

  DIGEST:

     Where new evidence submitted by carrier
     establishes that seal applied to shipment at
     origin was the same seal broken at destination,
     carrier has established clear seal record, and
     reasonable presumption arises that no loss
     occurred in transit.

     Overnite Transportation Company (OTC) requests
reconsideration of our decision in the matter of Overnite
Transportation Company, B-213842, February 8, 1984. In that
decision, we affirmed our Claims Group (Claims) settlement
which denied OTC's claim for reimbursement of $3,904.08.
The setoff against OTC was taken by the Department of the
Air Force to satisfy a claim for Air Force property
allegedly lost during shipment by OTC.

     Claims concluded that a prima facie case of carrier
liability was established since the government bill of lad-
ing (GBL) showed that 22 skids had been accepted by OTC for
shipment and only 21 skids were delivered by OTC.  These
facts constituted a prima facie case of carrier liability
based on the loading of a specified number of skids and
shortage at delivery. See United States v. Seaboard Coast-
line Ry., 384 F. Supp. 1103 (1974). We found that the car-
rier had not rebutted the prima facie case of carrier lia-
bility established by the record.

     The record showed that a seal had been applied to the
vehicle at origin, but the seal number was not recorded on
the one GBL copy contained in the Claims file. We noted
that OTC's driver also had an opportunity to inspect the
shipment at loading. He verified the count and accepted the
GBL which specified 22 skids and contained no seal number.
Furthermore, the record failed to show that the government
requested exclusive use of the vehicle, which would require
sealing of the vehicle against theft or loss and damage and
the keeping of precise seal records for shipper's load and
count which Places on the shipper responsibility for the
load and count.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most