About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-214383 1 (1984-05-08)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadlrm0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                         THE COMPTROLLER OENERAL
DECISION                 OP THE UNITED        STATES
                         WASHINGTON. 0. C. 1054
                  ~IT%


FILE:   B-214383              DATE:     May 8, 1984

MATTER OF:     William M. Gasa -- Reimbursement of Parking
                 Permit

DIGEST:


     Employee may not be reimbursed for the cost
     of a monthly parking permit which he was
     unable to use near his permanent duty sta-
     tion because of a temporary duty (TDY)
     assignment in another locale. Such a cost
     is a personal expense and there is no basis
     upon which it would become a Government
     obligation upon the assignment of an
     employee to TDY.

     This decision is in response to a request for an
advance decision by Ms. Margaret E. Wenzel, an authorized
certifying officer of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Chicago, Illinois. The issue. presented is whether an
employee may be reimbursed for the cost of a monthly park-
ing permit which he was unable to use near his permanent
duty station because of a temporary duty (TDY) assignment
in another locale. For the following reasons, we hold
that the cost of a monthly parking permit is in the nature
of a personal expense and there is no basis upon which
such cost would become a Government obligation upon the
assignment of an employee to TDY.

     Mr. William M. Gasa is an IRS employee whose perma-
 nent duty station is Chicago, Illinois. He usually com-
 mutes to his office by driving his privately owned vehicle
 from his residence to a train station, parking the auto-
 mobile, and taking a commuter train to downtown Chicago.
 He pays a monthly parking fee of $15, which must be paid
 on a quarterly basis. On June 20, 1983, shortly after
 purchasing his quarterly permit for the months of July,
 August, and September 1983, he was advised that he would
 be detailed to Lombard, Illinois, a Chicago suburb, for an
 indefinite period of time. As of October 13, 1983, the
 date of his claim, Mr. Gasa was still on his temporary
 detail, and so was unable to use the parking permit. On
 the voucher submitted, Mr. Gasa claims reimbursement of
 the $45 fee for the value of the parking permit which he
 was unable to use.






                    o 2S1I

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most