About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-213495 1 (1984-04-18)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadlqv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                          THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
  DECISION               . OP THE UNITEO       STATU8
                        V WASHINGTON. 0. C. 20548


FILE: B-213495                         DATE:   April 18, 1984

MATTER OF: A & J Construction Co., Inc.

DIGEST:

1.   Authority to correct mistakes alleged after
     bid opening but before award is vested in pro-
     curing agencies, and the weight to be given
     the evidence in support of an asserted mistake
     is a question of fact. GAO therefore will not
     disturb an agency's determination concerning
     correction unless there is no reasonable basis
     for it.

2.   Agency reasonably may rely upon a solicitation
     clause providing that the unit price will
     govern in case of a discrepancy between the
     unit and the extended prices where the bid
     would be low whether either price were used
     and it is not clear that it is the unit,
     rather than the extended, price that is incor-
     rect.


     A&J Construction Co., Inc. requests reformation of a
contract with the Bureau of Reclamation, Department of the
Interior, for furnishing and installing pipe and associated
work on the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Project in Valley
County, Nebraska. The firm accepted award subject to an
agreement to submit its mistake in bid claim, raised before
award, to our Office.

     Three mistakes are involved here: an error in
extension of unit prices for two line items; another in
addition of unit or extended prices for individual line
items; and a third allegedly caused by subtracting the
incorrect total for these items from the intended bid price
to arrive at a subtotal for the remainder of the more than
200 items.

     We agree with the agency's decision to correct the
first two mistakes, resulting in a $7,755 decrease in A&J's
original bid price, but find that the evidence of the third
mistake is not clear and convincing. Since the contract as
awarded reflects the correction, there is no legal basis
for reformation.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most