About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-212487 1 (1984-04-17)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadlqs0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                           TECOMPTROLLER CENERAL
OIClION                  OP THE UNITED        SITATES
               SWAS HI NOTON, O. C. 20548




FILE:   B-212487               DATE: April 17, 1984

MATTER OF:    Reimbursement for Banking Charges and
              Attorney's Fees - Inspector General
              Investigation
DIQEST:


        An employee subject to an Inspector
        General investigation, caused by a third
        party, may not be reimbursed charges he
        incurred for microfilming and research
        of his banking records after he produced
        the records at the Inspector General's
        request. There is no authority for
        reimbursement of the expenses that were
        voluntarily incurred, and for which
        there was no obligation to incur. More-
        over, attorney's fees incurred by the
        employee may not be paid since the
        agency, having decided to investigate
        the employee, did not have a common
        interest with him.


     Mr. John Balog, certifying officer with the
 Department of Agriculture's Marketing Service (AMS),
 requests an advance decision as to whether an AMS employee
 nay be reimbursed for attorney's fees and fees for repro-
 ducing his bank statements. The costs were incurred
 because of an investigation into allegations about the
 employee. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the
 employee may not be reimbursed.

                            FACTS

     An individual made an allegation that an AMS employee
 was receiving gratuities from a private corporation with
 which the employee had a potential to affect Government
 business. An Inspector General investigation of the
 employee's activities was initiated and the investigator
 asked the employee to furnish all of his personal banking
 records for 1980, 1981, and 1982. The employee states
 that the investigator informed him that production of the
 documents would show that he was cooperating and would
 save the investigator time by not having to obtain a
 subpoena. The employee complied and was billed $342.60 by
 two financial institutions for various microfilming and
 research charges.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most