About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-212548 1 (1984-01-24)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadlmt0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                           THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
   DECISION                 o   rsP THE UNITEO STATE
                         SWASHINGTON, 0 C. 20548




   FILE:  B-212548               DATE:   January 24, 1984

   MATTER OF: George A. Raub


   DIGEST:
          An employee of the Merit Systems Pro-
          tection Board submitted a written and
          timely request for use of 204 hours of
          annual leave subject to forfeiture
          at the end of the leave year. The
          Board denied use of leave due to work-
          load without scheduling it. The Board's
          failure to schedule the annual leave
          or request an exigency determination
          by the designated official constituted
          administrative error under 5 U.S.C.
          S 6304(d)(1)(A), and the leave may
          be restored.

     By letter of July 26, 1983, we were asked by the Merit
Systems Protection Board to determine whether its former em-
ployee, George A. Raub, is entitled to have annual leave
forfeited at the end of the 1982 leave year restored under
the provisions of 5 U.S.C. S 6304(d). We find that Mr. Raub
is entitled to restoration of the forfeited leave.

     On November 4, 1982 (more than three pay periods before
the end of the 1982 leave year), Mr. Raub, then an employee
of the Board's Office of Merit Review and Studies, requested
in writing that he be allowed to schedule 204 hours of use
or lose leave from November 23 to December 31, 1982. On
November 5, 1982, his supervisor denied the request due to
the office workload. On January 9, 1983, Mr. Raub requested
that the 204 hours of forfeited leave be restored.

     The Board states that the leave has not been restored
because of its understanding that the statute and imple-
menting regulations require that the leave actually be
scheduled in advance. Since Mr. Raub's leave request was
denied by his supervisor and the leave was never scheduled,
the Board asks whether it may restore the 204 hours of leave
forfeited by Mr. Raub.

     Subsection 6304(d)(1) of title 5 of the United States
Code provides for restoration of annual leave lost by the
operation of that section because of:


0-1-(03 9

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most