About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-208684.2 1 (1983-11-15)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadlkf0001 and id is 1 raw text is: - . 


                         THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
OECISION       •     .   OF THE UNITED STATES
                      '  WAS H I N GTO N. 0. C. 2054 8




FILE:  B-208684.2              DATE: November 15, 1983

MATTER OF:     Joule Maintenance Corporation


DIGEST:


      Where a protest has been sustained based in
      part on a finding that the solicitation was
      defective, the protester's subsequent
      request that GAO amend its recommended
      relief (that the agency resolicit after
      correcting the defective solicitation) and
      instead recommend award to the protester,
      is denied where the reconsideration request
      appears to be based on new information
      which would merely reinforce GAO's conclu-
      sion that the solicitation was defective.

      Joule Maintenance Corporation requests reconsidera-
 tion of our decision Joule Maintenance Corporation,
 B-208684, September 16, 1983, 83-2 CPD__, sustaining
 Joule's protest that the Department of the Army's decision
 to continue performing certain services in-house was based
 on an inaccurate cost comparison. We recommended that the
 Army resolicit and conduct a new cost comparison after
 correcting the noted deficiencies. Joule asks that we
 alter our recommendation and direct the Army to make award
 to Joule. We affirm our decision.

      We sustained Joule's protest, in part, based on our
 conclusion that the statement of work (SOW) in the solici-
 tation was deficient. Although the SOW directed offerors
 to include in their proposals only work currently per-
 formed by the in-house work force, it failed to indicate
 that the in-house work force was not performing certain
 work which seemed to be encompassed by the solicitation.
 We found that this deficiency could have misled Joule and
 other offerors into overstating their proposed costs.
 This deficiency, together with a failure by the Army to
 include its full first year labor costs in the government
 estimate, cast significant doubt on whether in-house per-
 formance would be less costly than contracting out, as the
 cost comparison had indicated. Since the deficient SOW
 was unfair to all offerors, not just Joule, we recommended
 that the Army initiate a new cost comparison with a new
 solicitation.                       ,'


                      0d 7A717

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most