About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-212031 1 (1983-09-27)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadlio0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
                          THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
  OECISION                 OF THE UNITED STATES
                            WAS-HING-TON. O.G. 2058




  FILE:   B-212031              DATE: September 27, 1983

  MATTER OF:     Ismene M. Kalaris - Annual Leave for
                 Attending Court Hearing
  DIGEST:

     An employee brought an action in United
     States District Court against the Department
     of Labor (DOL) seeking to prevent her removal
     from her position by the Secretary of Labor.
     She was charged 4 hours of annual leave for
     time spent observing oral argument in her
     case. The District Court ruled she was
     improperly separated but the United States
     Court of Appeals upheld her separation.
     We will not disturb DOL's exercise of discre-
     tion to charge her annual leave since there
     is no basis for an unsuccessful plaintiff
     suing the Federal Government to have such
     time considered official time. Furthermore,
     5 U.S.C. S 6322 granting court leave to
     jurors or witnesses does not apply here.


     Ms. Ismene M. Kalaris, a former Administrative Appeals
Judge, Benefits Review Board, Department of Labor (DOL),
contests DOL's decision to charge her 4 hours of annual
leave for time she spent observing oral argument in the case
of In Re Benefits Review Board, Civil Action Nos. 82-1278,
82-1406, (D.D.C. June 2, 1982). For the reasons which
follow, we uphold DOL's action charging Ms. Kalaris annual
leave.

     On June 1, 1982, Ms. Kalaris observed oral argument in
the case of In Re Benefits Review Board, cited above, a case
in which Ms. Kalaris was a plaintiff, challenging the
validity of the Secretary of Labor's action removing two
administrative law judges, one of whom was Ms. Kalaris, from
their positions on the Benefits Review Board. The District
Court held that the Secretary had no authority to remove the
administrative law judges and the court declared the
Secretary's action null and void.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most