About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-210210 1 (1983-09-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadlht0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
~2~7


                        ' \ THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
     DECISION                OF THE UNITEO        STATES
                       ~j~iWASHINGTON. 0. C. 205.48



     FILE: B-210210                DATE: September 14, 1983

     MATTER OF: Commodity Futures Trading Commission--
                  Donations under Settlement Agreements

     DIGEST:
               The Commodity Futures Trading Commission
               lacks authority to adopt proposed practice
               of accepting a charged party's promise to
               make an educational donation as all or part
               of a settlement agreement. Donations would
               be contractually tailored to aid in the ful-
               fillment of one of the Commission's statutory
               goals, establishing and maintaining research
               and information programs. Such donations
               are not reasonably related to prosecutorial
               authority.


     This decision is in response to a request for our
opinion regarding the legality of the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission's (Commission) proposed new policy for
the settlement of cases brought under prosecutorial power
provided it by the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended,
7 U.S.C. § 9, 13b (1976). The proposal would allow the
Commission to accept a charged party's promise to make a
donation to an educational institution as all or part of
a settlement agreement. The donation, as committed under
the settlement agreement, would, in turn, aid in the ac-
complishment of one of the Commission's statutory func-
tions: to establish and maintain research and information
programs to * * * assist in the development of educational
and other informational materials regarding futures trad-
ing * * *.  7 U.S.C. § 22(a) (1976).

     The Commission perceives the proposal as a way of
achieving its educational. goals by means other than its
own direct fiscal outlays. The promise to make such a
donation as part of a settlement agreement would not in-
volve an actual transfer of funds to the Commission. As
explained below, we conclude that the Commission would
exceed its prosecutorial authority were it to implement
the proposed policy.

     In its request, submitted for the Commission by its
General Counsel, the Commission asks that we consider whether
             /

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most