About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-211879.2 1 (1983-08-08)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadlgf0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                          ~THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
  DECISION                 OP THE UNITED STATEN
                           WASHINGTON. O.C. 2054U




  FILE: B-211879.2               DATE: August 8, 1983
  MATTER OF:       Zimmerman Plumbing and Heating

                   Co., Inc.--Reconsideration

  DIGEST:

1. Apparent mistake in bid on alternate deductive
    items does not provide sufficient basis to
    reject the bid for the basic item, which offers
    to perform the entire project called for under a
    solicitation providing for award of the basic
    item if funds are available and it is determined
    that the funds are available.

2. Where it is clear from a protester's initial
    submission that the protest involves matters
    which GAO does not consider, GAO will dismiss
    protest without requesting an agency report or
    holding a conference which would serve no useful
    purpose.

    Zimmerman Plumbing and Heating Co., Inc. (Zimmerman),
requests reconsideration of our decision in Zimmerman
Plumbing and Heating Company, Inc., B-211879, June 24,
1983, 83-2 CPD 16, in which we dismissed Zimmerman's
protest under a solicitation issued by the Veterans
Administration (VA) for the Battle Creek Michigan Medical
Center remodeling project No. 515-811360. In that
decision, we found that Zimmerman's protest was not for
consideration on the merits because its allegation that the
low bidder had submitted a below-cost bid under certain
items did not constitute a legal basis for precluding
award, and Zimmerman's allegation that the bid was mistaken
was unsubstantiated, and, in any event, that if the bid
appeared so unreasonably low as to suggest error, the
contracting officer would be obligated to seek appropriate
verification prior to making award.

     In its request for reconsideration, Zimmerman asserts
that there is no evidence that the low bidder did not make
a mistake in its bid and further contends that if no
mistake is claimed, the VA should make an award to the low
bidder for one of the alternate deductive items, on which
its bid was extremely low, and resolicit for the work
deducted under that item. We find the request for
reconsideration without merit.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most