About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-210168.2 1 (1983-07-06)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadlef0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
                       ~\THE COMPTRIOLLER GENtiRAL
bECISION            T( . OF THE UNIT3O        STATES
                   ~. /WA5SHINGT N. 0.0C. 20548
                   .0j


FILE:   B-210168.2             DATE:   July 6$ 1983

MATTER OF:       Transiac Corporation--Reconsideration


DIGEST:

        Prior decision dismissing portion of protest
        as untimely is affirmed on reconsideration
        because protester has not shown that
        decision was based on errors of fact or law.-

        Transiac Corporation (Transiac) has requested-
   reconsideration of our decision dismissing in part and
   denying in part its protest of award of a contract to
   LeCroy Research Systems Corporation (LeCroy) by the
   Defense Nuclear Agency pursuant to invitation for bi4s
   No. DNA002-83-B-0007. Transiac Corporation, B-210116,
   May 23, 1983, 83-1 CPD 554.

        Transiac argues that we should have considerei
   its argument that LeCroy's bid was nonresponsive
   because its product did not meet various salient
   characteristics requirements set forth in the brand
   name or equal invitation. We dismissed this portion--
   of Transiac's protest as untimely because it concerned
   the responsiveness of LeCroy's bid, but was not filed
   in our Office within 10 working days after Transiac
   should have known this basis for protest as requisd-
   under our Bid Protest Procedures. 4 C.F.R.
   § 21.2(b)(2) (1983).

        Transiac argues that it was impossible for it to
   have filed this issue of its protest within the 10-day
   time limit because it did not have access to the
   specifications of the LeCroy product within the 10-day
   tim. limit. 2.' do not agree. The record upon which
 we based our , zli.r decision shows that a public bid
   opening was held on November 15, 1982, and that
   Transiac filcd its initial protest- i our Office on
   December 13. Cransiac's December 13 filing showed
   that Tr-ansiac tad knowldge of the contents of the
   LeCroy bid. However, Transiac's initial protest did
   not raise tho argutr.nt that LeCroy's p.-,uct did not
   meet the invitation's salient, characteristics; this

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most