About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-205084 1 (1983-06-08)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadlda0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                  0     TAELOMPTROLLER GENERAL 02 I5/Q9
DECISION                  F. o FETHE UNITED STATES
                         WASHINGTON. D. C. 20548




FILE: B-205084                DATE: June 8, 1983

MATTER OF: The Department of the Army--Request for
                 Reconsideration

DIGEST:

1.   Where a carrier questions whether a shipper
     tendered property for transportation that
     the shipper claims was lost, the applicable
     case law requires the shipper to furnish some
     substantive evidence of tender in order to
     establish a prima facie case of carrier
     liability.

 2.  A prima facie case of carrier liability is
     not established where the shipper furnishes
     no substantive evidence to support his alle-
     gation that he tendered to the carrier prop-
     erty that he later claims was lost.


     The Department of the Army, on behalf of itself, the
 Departments of the Navy and the Air Force and the United
 States Marine Corps, requests reconsideration of our
 decision in Paul Arpin Van Lines, Inc., B-205084, June 2,
 1982. We affirm our decision.

     In our decision, we found that a prima facie case of
 liability against a carrier, Paul Arpin Van Lines, Inc.,
 for the alleged loss of certain household items during
 transportation was not established where the only evi-
 dence of tender of those items was the member's written
 acknowledgment of the criminal penalties for filing a
 false claim. That finding was based on the fact that the
 record was devoid of any indication that the shipping car-
 tons had been opened or that most of the items allegedly
 lost related directly to any category of items listed on
 the shipper's inventory. Thus, we reasoned that, even
 though Arpin had been responsible for packing the member's
 household goods, further evidence of tender was required
 before the burden of proof shifted to Arpin to show that it
 was not liable for the loss. We concluded that, under
 those circumstances, the Army improperly subtracted the
 member's claim for the lost items from money otherwise
 owed Arpin for the transportation of the member's household
 goods.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most