About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-208690.3 1 (1983-04-13)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadkzx0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                         THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
OECISION                 O..,. oF THE UNITED STATES
                         WASHINGTON. 0. C. 20548




FILE: B-208690.3               DATE: April 13, 1983

MATTER OF:     Sea-Land Service, Inc.--Reconsideration


DIGEST:

      Where request for reconsideration fails to
      present facts or legal arguments which show
      that previous decision dismissing protest
      because issues raised by protester had been
      decided by court of competent jurisdiction
      was erroneous, decision is affirmed.

      Sea-Land Service, Inc. (SSI), requests that we
 reconsider our dismissal of the firm's protest against
 the award of a contract to American Coastal Line Joint
 Venture, Inc. (AMCO), under Military Sealift Command
 (MSC) multiple-award request for proposals (RFP)
 No. N0002282R1700 for ocean common carrier service.

      In our decision, Sea-Land Service, Inc.,
 B-208690.2, February 10, 1983, 83-1 CPD   , we
 dismissed SSI's protest because SSI raised-issues
 pertaining to AMCO's responsiveness and
 responsibility which were materially the same as
 those raised by United States Lines, Inc. (USL),
 another awardee under this RFP, in a civil action to
 set aside the award to AMCO. Since this civil action
 had been dismissed with prejudice by the United States
 District Court for the District of Columbia, we deter-
 mined, under decisions of this Office, that this dis-
 missal constituted an adjudication on the merits and
 barred further action by this Office. We stated that
 it is our policy not to consider matters where the
 material issues have been decided by a court. Since
 the USL suit involved the same material issues as
 SSI's protest to our Office, it was irrelevant that
 SSI was not a party to the litigation, and we
 dismissed SSI's protest.

      SSI argues that it raised issues not considered
 by the court and, therefore, our refusal to decide
 these issues on the theory of collateral estoppel is
 erroneous, and that dismissal of the protest is con-
 trary to our Bid Protest Procedures, 4 C.F.R. part 21
 (1982), as recently amended.


(7S;9/

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most