About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-207740 1 (1983-02-04)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadkwi0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
                                                      OL.I

                           THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
   DECISION                OF THE UNITEO STATES
                           WASHINGTON. O.C. 20548



  FILE: B-207740                 DATE: February 4, 1983

  MATTER OF:     Larry G. Lehecka - Waiver of Overpayment
                 of Pay - Erroneous Step Increase

  DIGEST:
             Employee was erroneously granted
             step increase to step 5 prior to
             completion of 104 weeks of service
             in step 4, as required by 5 U.S.C.
             S 5335(a)(2) (1976). Request for
             waiver of erroneous payments under
             provisions of 5 U.S.C. S 5584 (1976)
             is granted where overpayment resulted
             from administrative error, through no
             fault of employee, and record does
             not clearly establish that employee
             knew or should have known of proper
             waiting periods between step
             increases.

     This decision is in response to a request for recon-
sideration by the Navy Accounting and Finance Center of our
Claims Group's settlement Z-2829597-121, dated March 5,
1982, which granted a request for waiver by Mr. Larry G.
Lehecka under 5 U.S.C. S 5584 (1976). The claim against
Mr. Lehecka by the United States in the amount of $2,256,
represented the aggregate overpayments of pay made to him
resulting from a premature granting of a within-grade
increase. Mr. Lehecka is an employee of the Department
of the Navy, Pacific Missile Test Center, Point Mugu,
California. The basis for the settlement action was that
Mr. Lehecka reasonably could have assumed that the within-
grade increase he received on January 11, 1970, was correct
since his previous career history showed that he had never
experienced a 2-year waiting period for a within-grade
increase. Therefore, he could not have been expected to
have known at the time that he was being overpaid. Conse-
quently, the Claims Group concluded that collection of the
indebtedness would be against equity and good conscience.

     For the reasons stated below, we conclude that the
Navy's request for reconsideration should be denied, and
the granting of waiver should be sustained.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most