About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-209753.2 1 (1983-01-10)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadkuv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                         THE COMPTROLLER OENERAL
DECISION      .        . OF THE UNITEO        STATES
                         WASHINGTON. 0. C. 2054B




FILE:    B-209753.2           DATE: January 10, 1983

MATTER OF:        Polaroid Corporation -- Reconsideration


DIGEST:

       Procedural requirements of Administrative
       Procedure Act do not apply to interpreta-
       tion of timeliness rules of GAO Bid Pro-
       test Procedures, announced in published
       decision bf Comptroller General, since (1)
       GAO, as legislative branch agency, is not
       subject to the Act, (2) the Act does not
       apply to public contract matters, and (3)
       Act in any event does not apply to inter-
       pretations, as opposed to substantive
       changes, of published rules.

       Polaroid Corporation requests that we reconsider our
  decision Polaroid Corporation, B-209753, December 1, 1982,
  82-2 CPD    , in which we dismissed as untimely Polaroid's
  protest o  a small business set-aside. Polaroid contends
  that the dismissal is contrary to the provisions of our
  Bid Protest Procedures and violates the Administrative
  Procedure Act. We affirm the prior decision.

       Polaroid originally protested the set-aside decision
  (in connection with an item included in solicitation No.
  GSA-3YC-N-020, issued by the General Services Administra-
  tion) to the contracting officer, who denied the protest.
  One month later, on the date set for receipt of proposals,
  Polaroid filed its protest here. We viewed the protest
  here as untimely because it was not filed within 10 days
  of Polaroid's learning of the contracting officer's denial
  of the protest, as required by section 21.2(a) of our Pro-
  cedures (4 C.F.R. § 21.2(a) (1982)).

       In so doing, we noted that while our Procedures were
  susceptible to the interpretation that a protest based on
  an alleged solicitation deficiency would be timely if
  filed with this Office prior to the time set for receipt
  of proposals, regardless of whether there had been an
  earlier denial of a protest lodged with the agency, a
  contrary interpretation had been adopted in Informatics,
  Inc., 58 Comp. Gen. 750 (1979), 79-2 CPD 159, affId
  BzT-4322, December 3, 1979, 79-2 CPD 387.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most