About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-203882.3 1 (1982-10-15)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadkre0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                         THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
 OECISION                OF THE UNITEO STATES
                         WASHINGTON, 0.C. 20548




 FILE: B-203882. 3             DATE: October 15, 1982

 MATTER OF: Amdahl Corporation--Reconsideration


 DIGEST:

1.   Prior decision, in which protester failed
     to demonstrate that agency did not fulfill
     its obligation to ascertain possibility of
     alternate sources, is affirmed. Burden is
     on protester to show that agency erred.
     Protester's continuing inability to
     identify alternate sources confirms--rather
     than refutes--agency's determination that
     no alternate sources for software were
     available.

2.   Contention that protester's offer to commit
     in writing to provide software support was
     sufficient to constitute alternate source
     that agency had to consider is without
     merit. Agency's requirement was for a
     present, existing, functioning capability
     to provide support. We agree with agency's
     apparent conclusion that offer of commit-
     ment, without evidence of capability, was
     insufficient.

     Amdahl Corporation (Amdahl) has requested reconsidera-
tion of our decision in the matter of Amdahl Corporation,
B-203882.2, May 5, 1982, 82-1 CPD 421. In that decision,
we denied a protest by Amdahl against an invitation for bids
issued by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA) for the acquisition of an International Business
Machines (IBM) computer. Amdahl contended that the IFB was
unduly restrictive because it did not permit consideration
of compatible non-IBM computers. We found that NASA's
requirement for an IBM computer was reasonably based and not
unduly restrictive because it was based on a requirement for
software support which NASA reasonably concluded was avail-
able only on an IBM computer.

     Amdahl contends that our prior decision was factually
and legally in error, mainly on the statement in our
decision that:

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most