About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-207353.2 1 (1982-09-08)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadkpl0001 and id is 1 raw text is:   pm i  -
             S           -
  S.            -.......a..a .~A,4,e-4~Ii.LJ4.-S.~~. * *.~d..aaa..~.-w
*      &.. -b.- %-. -~---
                                                       III


pA a


                (7       THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
                         WASHINGTON. DC. 20546
                  IT.O.L JOFTHEU        IE[     TTE



FILE: fB-207353.2              DATE: September 8, 198,2

MATTER OF:    Edron, Inc,--Reconsideration

DIGEST:

      Prior decision dismissing protest as
      'untimely is affirmed where significant
      issue is not present to justify exception
      to the application of GAO Bid Protest
      Procedures and fact that protest was only
      a few days late does not satisfy timeli-
      ness requirements which are strictly
      applied.

      Edron, Inc. (Edron), requests reconsideration of
 our prior decision in the matter of Edron, Inc.,
 B-207353, June 9, 1982, 82-1 CPD 557, which dismissed
 as untimely Edron's protest against the Defense Per-
 sonnel Support Ce.nter's (DPSC) award of a contract
 under solicitation No. DLA120-82-R-0789.
      Edron contends that the protest raises issues
 significant to procurement practices which should be
 considered on the merits under section 21.2(c) of our
 Bid Protest Procedures (4 C.F.R. part 21 (1982)) arid
 that the protest was untimely by only 1 or 2 days.

     Our June 9, 1982, decinion was based on the fact
 that on April 12, 1982, Edron received DPSC's reply
 denying Edron's protest to the contracting officer.
 Edron filed a protest with cur Office on May 3, 1982,
 which was untimely.

      Under S 21.2(a) of our id Protest Procedures,
 which requires that when a protest is initially filed
 with the contracting agency, a Eubs2quent protest to
 our Office must be filed within 10 working days of
 knowledge of the initial adverse agency action.
 Consequently, we held Edron's protest was untimely
 because the lasc: day for timely filing its protest
 was April 26, 1982.

      Although the rule may seem harsh to Edron because
 the protest is ,-'ly a few days late, we do not regard
 our timeliness stcandards as mere technicalities. To


7*'tY t 'W~'  rt r~  w~r~~ .  . '~r-  -   e7~,a~p !'-  *-*  Y~   er rw ~ w  r

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most