About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-204974 1 (1982-06-24)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadklh0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



      0E rIv.)JN              Or-     . LJ ! ITL D BTATFO
                    4WA'HaG7N                  . 3. 0 5 4i13



     FILE:    B-.204974             DATE: June 24, 1982

     MATTER OF, Seymour Zirin

     DIGE ST;  Where an individual receives a lump-stum
               payment part of which is erron4ous and he
               is promptly notLified of the mistake and
               asked to refund the mney, the fact that.
               lie was without fault dons not provide a
               basis for granting waiver since It would
               not be acyainst, equity and good conscience
               and would be in the best interests of the
               United StaLes to recover the money.
      This acton is the result of an appeal by Mr. Seymour
 Zirin of a settlement of outr Claims Group denying his request
 for waiver of his debt to the United States In the riount of
 $861,.74. The debt arose as a result of 2n erroneous payment
 fot compensatory leave included in a lump-sum paynent of
 $11,912.20. 11;s request for waiver is denied for the
 following reasons.

     The payment occurred at the Lime of Mr. Zirin's retire-
ment frorm the United States civil service at grade GS-14
with over 37 years of service. FollowiJng his retirement he
received a lump-sum payment for I regular workday and accrued
annual and compensatory leave. The erroneous payment resulted
from the agency's failure to consider the fact that by opera-
tLion of the law the.amout. he could be paid for the compensa-
tory leave was limited. The lump-sum check he received was
dated January 16, 1981.  Tt appears that he was notified of
the error 411 his lump-sum payment b' the certifying officer
on Pebruary 9, 1981, through a telephone conversation.  A
letter from the certifying officer explaining the error and
requestng refund of the erroneous payment was also sent on
that date, Mr. Zirin says he did not receive the letter
until February 18, 1981.

     Upon receiving the request f.Jr refund, Mr. Zirin
asserted that he was withotft fault in the aiitter and thus
should he granted a waiver of the debt.  H.. said that the
money, apparently the lump-sum pZyent , wa:; unavailable since
he had invested it. Subsequently his requa!;L for waiver was
r-eferled t- the Claim.; Group ol L,1i r : for consideration.
ills reque4 t was den ed on the basI s thatL a;; I nl': *a l with
n3 r,.uch Fe6eral serv 1. e as he hd and who  od app Intly
worked for compeinsat.,ry  Lime throluihot Uh? career must

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most