About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-206258 1 (1982-06-16)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadkkm0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 








B-206258


                              /JIts-r

THIN COMPTFIOLIER FCNIRAL
OF THE UNITIC BTATUU3 /f 75Y
WASHINGTON,  3 0, 12054U



      DATE June 16, 1982


MATTER C

DIGESTi


Philip A. Jarmack - Reimbursement of Relocation
Expenses - IPA Assignment


1. An employee stationed in Chicago, Illinols,
    was given an Intergovernmental Personnel Act
    (IPA) assignment to Phoenix, Arizona, and
    was subsequently transferred to Washington,
    Dec, Action of the certifying officer in
    suspending reimbursement of the expenses
    of a house-hunting tr.p from Phoenix to
    Washington and expenses of selling a home
    in Phoenix is proper, No such reimburse-
    ment is provided under the IPA and since
    Phoenix was not his permanent duty station
    such expenses are not reimbursable under
    5 U.S.C. §§ 5724 and 5724a$


            2. A computation based on the constructive
                cost of a house-hunting trip from Chicago
                to Washington is correct since Chicago was
                the employee's old duty station. Reirrburse-
                ment of relocation expenses incurred by
                the employee in selling his Chicago resi-
                dence is proper since the administrative
                intent was to transfer the employee at a
                later date so that he would not be returning
                to his old duty station.

            3. According to Federal Claims Collection
                Standards an emplqyee may be pcrmitted to
                repay his debt in regular installments over
                a period of not more than 3 years (see
                4 C.FR. § 102.9). The agency should
                charge interest on that debt, in conformity
                with the Treasury Fiscal Requirements
                Manual.

     Mr. Clarence E. Smith, a certifying officer with the
Department of Health and Human Services (DuS), raises
seven questions regarding an employeole entitlement to reim-
butsement for relocation expenses associated with a change of
permanent duty station after an Intergovernmental Personnel
Act assignment. The certifying officer's settjment is cor-
rect for the reasons that follow.


#, - .'


'V '


..~* -.....*.S - '9 .~ear.v*- .~-p---vne, .t.-.


DECISION


FILEi


DFt

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most