About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-203015 1 (1982-02-19)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadkbr0001 and id is 1 raw text is: / FILE: B-203015 MATTER OF; DIGEBTi DATM: February 19, 1982 William T, Lebo - Reimbursement for Dependents' Relocation Travel When employee and dependents are authorized to traVel botween off(c~ial duty stations by commercial air or privately owned vehicle (POV) in connection with a permanent change of station, employee's election to travel uqaccompanied by POV does not limit his entttlemeut to reimbursement for dependentol air travel from alternate point of origin to constructive cost of dependents' concurrent travel by POV since dependents are not required to accompany employee, There is no requirement for authorization of depend- ents' separate travel by mode approved in travel order. Reimbursement for dependents' travel from alternate point of origin may not exceed construc- tive cost of common carrier transportation between old and new duty stations, M. K. Farnsworth, B-183563, May 4, 1976, modified. This action is in response to the request of Mr. 11, 0, Miller, an Accounting and Finance Officer of the Defense Logistics Agency, U.S. Department of Defense, for an advance decision concerning the entitlement uf Mr. William T, Lebo to reimbursement for the constructive cost of the transportation of his wife and daughter to his new permanent duty station, Incident to Hr. Lebols permanent change of station (PCS) transfer from the Air Force Audit Agency, Fairborn, Ohio, to the Defense Audit Service, Arlington, Virginia, he was authorized travel for himself, his wife and daughter between official duty stations by commercial air. Travel by privately owned vehicle (POV) was also approved as advantageous to the Government, In anticipa- tion of his transfer, Mr. Lebo sold his home in Fairborn and temporarily moved his dependents to Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, where they were residing when he accepted the new position. He traveled by POV from Fairborn to his new duty station. His wife and daughter later traveled by commercial air from Oklahoma City to the Washington, D.C., area. In addition to a mileage allowance for his own travel by POV, Hr. Lebo claims reimbursement for his dependents' transportation limited to the constructive cost of commercial air travel between Fairborn, Ohio, and the Washington, D.C., area. Specifically, he claims the constructive cost of his family's travel by POV from Fairborn THI NCOMPTROLLU IN5RAL LP THI UNITED BTA'EU WABHINO. No 0C. 2OU45 W .2 4-4=2

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most