About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-200718.3 1 (1982-02-08)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadkbe0001 and id is 1 raw text is:                   I~~~ 2O2/'                                        T


                                            THE COMPTROLLER GWENERAL
                   DECISION      ,OF THU UNITED                  I3TATES
                                            WASIHINGTON, D.C. 20548B



                   FILE:   B-200718.3             DATE: February 8, 1982
                   MATTER OF: A,J, Fowler Corporation--Second Request
                                for Reconsideration

                   DIGEST;
                         In resolving a bid protest, GAO is not
                         confined to address only those issues
                         or arguments raised by the parties to
                         the protest, The purpose ofeGAO's bid
                         protest function is to insure compliance
                         with the rules and regulations governing
                         the expenditure of public funds, Accord-
                         ingly, where GAO is aware of a regula-
                         tion that is relevant to a particular
                         situation, GAO will apply it appropriately,
                         whether or not the parties have taken notice
                         of it.

                         This decision responds to AJ. Fowler Corporation's
                    second request that we reconsider our decision in joore
                    Service, Inc., B-200718, August 17, 1981, 81-2 CPI) 145,
                    in which we sustained a protest against award to E'owler
                    under invitation for bids (IFB) DAITS1-80-B-0048 issued
                    by the Department of the Army.  We affirm that decision.

                        The IFB sought bids for refuse collection and dis-
 -.1                posal services at 3,582 quarters at Fort Bliss, Texas.
                   We sustained Moore's protest because the Army failed to
                   advise offerors of its plans to increase the number of
,                   80-84 gallon mobile toters which the Army expected to
                   provide in place of the 30 gallon galvanized containers
                   at most of the quarters. We found that a competition
                   based on the imminent availability of that increased
                   number of toters may have yielded a substantial reduc-
4.';                tion in the bid prices.  We therefore recomrended that
                    the Fowler contract renewal option not be exercised,
                    and that the Army conduct a new procurement and award
'I                 a new contract for the fiscal year 1982 requirement.

                        Fowler's first request for reconsideration was based
                   on the view that we failed to recognize that the contrac-
                   tual obligation on which offerors bid was to service 3,582
I!


!'I



I Y

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most