About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-202182 1 (1982-01-19)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadkad0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
       / / 730 ~Kt                            O7,
                             d   H  C~pT',                 N       /,
                                    COMPTROLLER 3         RLAe       I
       DECISION         I       O   T'HE    IUNITEDE BYATEIB
                                WAJHINWTON,        .,.2 O15,.



       FILE; B-202182                 DATE: January 19, 1982

       MATTER OF: Joseph Contarino, et al.- Hazardous
                    Duty Differential
       DIG3EST:

                19  claims of employees otherwise eligible
                    for hazardous duty differential under
                    5 US.C § 5545(d) are denied because
                    their exposure to the hazard was not
                    irregular or intermittent as required
                    by statute.

                2.  Whether particular situation warrants
                    payment of a hazardous duty differen-
                    tial is decision vested primarily in
                    the employing agency and GAO will not
                    substitute its judgment for that of
                    agency officials unless that judgment
                    was clearly wrong or was arbitrary and
                    capricious.
                3.  In absence of statutory provision so
                    authorizing, costs and attorney's fees
                    arising out of claim against Government
                    are not recoverable.

        Are General Schedule employees who are otherwise elJ.-
  'gible for a hazardous duty differential under 5 U.S.C.
  §5545(d) entitled to it when their assigned duty involves
  regular and constant exposure to toxic chemical materials?
  This is the question presented by this case. For the follow-
  ing reasons, we answer it negatively.

        This decision is in response to consolidated appeals
   by Messrs. Joseph Contarino, Malcolm Brandenburg, Charles J.
   Triantafillos, Ms. Madlyn Stroud, Messrs. Marlow B. Ludwig
   and Albert J. May (claimants) from our Claims Group's actions
   of July 3, 1979, Settlement Cortificate Nos. Z-2914101 to
   Z-2814106, respectively, which denied their claims for haz-
   ardous duty differential under 5 U.S.C. § 5545(d). The
   claimants are presently (or formerly) employed as General
   Schedule employees by the Dental Clinic Prosthodontics Lab-
   oratory (DCPL) at Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC),
   Washington, D.C., and seek hazardous duty differential for





4                                                       a

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most