About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-198529 1 (1981-09-24)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadjtc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

V_ 0,L_
              7. THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECISION                 OF THE UNITED STATES
                             WASHINGTO    .0.C. 20548
                 UN~ITE


FILE:         B-198529         DATE: September 24, 1981

MATTER OF:       Paul Arpin Van Lines, Inc.


DIGEST:
     Request for reconsideration of prior decision
     affirming settlement of claim is denied where
     new evidence claimant offers was considered
     in reaching prior decision.


     Paul Arpin Van Lines, Inc. (Arpin) requests recon-
sideration of our decision of June 9, 1981 in which we
affirmed a settlement by our Claims group. The settle-
ment had disallowed Arpin's claim for $46.63 collected
with respect to damage to a television set shipped under
GBL M-1867834. Noting that the television repair order
contains a notation, picture wavy, Arpin had contended
that the set was originally found to have had a wavy
picture, indicating that the damage complained of could
not have occurred during shipment. The repair order
also contained the further notation damper tube was
busted and out of socket - could have been done by
moving.

     On reconsideration, Arpin has submitted copies of
certain documents which it believes we did not have be-
fore us when our original decision was rendered. Arpin's
belief in this regard, however, is incorrect. The docu-
ments were in our file, and indeed, were those we relied
on in reaching our original decision. These included,
in addition to the repair order: (1) the owner's state-
ment that his original complaint had been that the set
produced sound but no picture, and (2) his explanation
that after the picture was restored by replacing a 6LB6
damper tube, it was found to be wavy, necessitating
additional repairs.

     In our prior decision, we concluded that Arpin's
position was not supported by the evidence it cited
since, if the owner's statement (which Arpin furnished)
is correct, Arpin's interpretation of the repair crder
must be wrong and Arpin failed to meet its burden of proof.


  .     . . . . .. . . .

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most