About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-200847.3 1 (1981-08-28)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadjrq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 





                               ~ -~THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
              DECISION        '  iYA* OF THE UNITED STATES
                                     WASHINGTON, 0. C. 20548



              FILE:      BD200847          DATE: August 28, 1981
              MATTER OF:
                            Jack Roach Cadillac -- Request for
                              Reconsideration
              DIGEST:

                   Prior decision is affirmed where record on
                   reconsideration does not show that prior
                   decision was based on error of law or fact.


                   Jack Roach Cadillac requests reconsideration of
              our decision in Bob McDorman Chevrolet, Inc. and Jack
              Roach Cadillac, B-200846, B-200847, B-200847.2, B-200848,
              March 13, 1981, 81-1 CPD 194, in which we dismissed
              its protest against the award of two contracts to Metro
              Automotive Parts by the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA).

                   Jack Roach Cadillac and Bob McDorman are fran-
              chised Chevrolet parts dealers, while Metro is not.
              Both protesters argued in connection with our initial
              decision that the solicitation (which was not ex-
              pressly limited to franchised Chevrolet parts dealers)
              could not be prorerly performed by a firm which does
              not hold such a franchise. We dismissed the argument
              because our Office does not review protests against
              affirmative determinations of responsibility unless
              the protester shows either that the solicitation con-
              tained a definitive responsibility criterion which
              was not applied or that procuring officials may have
Icommitted fraud. We also dismissed contentions by
              Jack Roach Cadillac relating to Metro's status as
              a regular dealer for purposes of the Walsh-Healey
              Act.

                   In requesting reconsideration, Jack Roach Cadillac
              asserts that the invitation's tight delivery schedule
              should have been treated as a definitive criterion
              of responsibility. Further, tha firm says that this
              Office should find that the contracting officer failed
              to comply with internal Department of Defense and
              Army practices and procedures regarding preaward
              surveys. Jack Roach Cadillac suggests that this

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most