About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-201815 1 (1981-03-25)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadjfs0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


.  • t


/-~iiJ -7 -D


                 =THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
OECISION                     OF THE UNITE            STATES
                          Z WASHINGTON, 0 C. 20549




FILE:  B-201815       DATE: March 25, 1981


MATTER OF:      Beatrice M. Lansdown


Employee on promotion from grade GS-8, step 6,
to GS-9, was erroneously given pay rate of
step 7, rather than correct rate of step 5.
Employee immediately notified personnel office
of error, but overpayments continued for
6 months before corrected. Since the employee
received the overpayments knowing an error had
been made waiver is not appropriate. Employee's
assertion that money was not set aside for
refund because the exact amount of the overpay-
ment was unknown due to overtime pay, does not
provide valid reason for waiver, since basic
rates of pay and their step increments could
easily be determined. As a result, requiring
repayment is not against equity and good
conscience. 5 U.S.C. 5584.


     This action is in response to a letter dated November 5,
1980, from Ms. Beatrice M. Lansdown, a civilian employee of
the Department of Agriculture, requesting reconsideration of
the action of our Claims Group, dated August 15, 1980, which
denied waiver of her indebtedness to the United States in the
amount of $714.14, which arose from erroneous payments of
compensation during the period March 12 through October 20,
1979. We agree with the action of the Claims Group.

     The file shows that Ms. Lansdown was employed as a
Supervisory Market News Assistant, grade GS-8, step 6.
Effective March 12, 1979, she was promoted to grade GS-9.
The personnel action in her case shows that she was given
the pay rate of step 7, whereas her pay rate should have
been as a step 5. Immediately after Ms. Lansdown received
her Form AD-350, notice of promotion, she notified appro-
priate officials of the error. In spite of the fact that
she received assurances that her pay rate was correct, she
again questioned them in October 1979, at which time the
error was acknowledged by the personnel office. It was
concluded by our Claims Group that she knew or should have


DIGEST:


fl/ *7o =0


-0-1 14 9 _

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most