About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-291934 1 (2003-04-23)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadiwc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: I & , G A 0 Comptroller General AAccountability * Integrity * Reliability of the United States United States General Accounting Office DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Washington, DC 20548 The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release. Decision Matter of: Exelon Services Federal Group File: B-291934 Date: April 23, 2003 Marilyn L. Hudson, Esq., Blevins, Hudson & Kizer, for the protester. Donald E. Barnhill, Esq., and Judith Ann G. Laughlin, Esq., for BMAR & Associates, Inc.; Stephen I. Lingenfelter, Esq., and Karl Dix, Jr., Esq., Smith, Currie & Hancock, for Vanguard Contractors, Inc.; Jonathan M. Bailey, Esq., for Global Engineering and Construction LLC; and John E. McCarthy, Esq., Daniel R. Forman, Esq., and Richard J. Bednar, Esq., Crowell & Moring, for Ameresco, Inc., intervenors. Steve Feldman, Esq., and Margaret Simmons, Esq., U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, for the agency. Paul I. Lieberman, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST Agency evaluation of past performance is unobjectionable where protester's past performance record included adverse information, the agency pointed out the evaluated problem past performance areas during discussions and considered the protester's explanations, including its disagreement with aspects of the underlying negative information, and reasonably concluded that a moderate risk rating was warranted. DECISION Exelon Services Federal Group protests that it should have been selected for an award under request for proposals (RFP) DACA87-02-R-0003, issued by the Army Engineering and Support Center (CEHNC) for quick responses for facility repair, renovation, conversion, alteration, additions and related activity for government installations and facilities (FRR), including architectural, civil, cost, electrical, environmental, and mechanical services. The protester contends that its proposal was improperly downgraded under the past performance evaluation factor, and that Exelon would have been in line for an award if its past performance had been properly evaluated. We deny the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most