About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-197533 1 (1980-07-01)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadijn0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                         THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECISION i         J     OF  THE   UNITED    STATES
                         WASHINGTON, D. C. 20548



FILE:  B-197533               DATE:  July 1, 1980

MATTER   OF:  Immigration and Naturalization Service -
              Overtime compensation for regular part-
              time employees
DIGEST:   Regular part-time immigration inspectors
          are not entitled to special rate of pay
          provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1353a because
          that statute applies only to full-time
          employees with regular tours of duty.
          49 Comp. Gen. 577 (1970). Any change
          broadening the coverage of the statute
          should be through legislation.


     This decision is rendered at the r-equ.st of the
Assistant Attorney General for Administration, United
States Department of Justice. The issue is whether
part-time immigration inspectors with regular tours of
duty can be compensated for overtime at the rate &peci-
fied in 8 U.S.C. § 1353a (1976), rather than that pro-
vided for under the provisions of 'the Federal Employees
Pay Act of 1945, 5 U.S.C. S 5542(a)(1976).

     In 49 Comp. Gen. 577 (1970) we held that part-time
immigra.tion inspectors employed on an intermittent
basis,-having no regular hours of duty, were not enti-
tled to the extra compensation provided for by section 1
of the act of Mar'ch 2, 1931, 8 U.S.C. § 1353a (1970),
for overtime work between 5 p.m. and 8 a.m. We find no
basis to reach a different conclusion for regular part-
time immigration inspectors.

     In United States v. Myers, 320 U.S. 561 (1944),
the Supreme Court considered the question of overtime
as it relates to the special Customs overtime act
provisions of 19 U.S.C. §§ 267 and 1451. The language
of the Customs overtime act is similar to that found
in 8 U.S.C. § 1353a, and the Courts have routinely
applied payment of the special rate of overtime evenly
for both statutes.  See Bishop v. United States, 174
Ct. Cl. 31., 38 (1966). The Supreme Court said in Myers
at page 571 that:

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most