About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-196187 1 (1980-05-05)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadifx0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                     7 THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
     DECISION                 OF  THE   UNITED STATE3
                              WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
                       CNIT C-


     FILE:  B-196187               DATE:   May 5, 1980

     MATTER   OF: Colin A  Houston & Associates,
                  Inc. -rclaim for Proposal Prep- tF7
                  aration Costs
     DIGEST:

           Claim for proposal preparation costs
           based on contention that agency know-
           ingly and capriciously failed to advise
           offerors of level of work it was prepared
           to fund is denied.  Record shows that
           failure of claimant to receive award
           was due solely to fact that its proposed
           costs for contract effort were excessive.


           Colin A. Houston & Associates Inc. (CAHA)
     claims that the Department of the Interior, Bureau
'2// of Mines (Interior), improperly failed to advise
     offerors of the exceedingly limited funds available
     for the performance of the contract awarded under
     request for proposals (RFP) JO-199050, thereby
     misleading CAHA in the preparation of -its proposal.
     The RFP called for the development of a systematic
     approach for selecting surface treatments which
     would promote coal dust wetting with water in under-
     ground mining operations.

          CAHA initially protested the matter contending
     that the successful offeror was not capable of
     accomplishing the required literature search,
     sampling analysis, correlation of data, and writing
     of a manual with an expenditure of no more than
     $66,900, the contract award price. Because Interior's
     protest report revealed that the Government estimate
     for the contract work was only for 1.3 years of work
     at $102,870, CAHA, in a letter dated March 10, 1980,
     withdrew its protest.  In this letter CAHA alleged
     that it was entitled to be compensated for its
     proposal preparation costs of $12,647.12 because
     Interior knowingly and capriciously withheld the
     level of work it was prepared to fund. Consequently,
     we are at this point treating the matter solely as a
     claim for proposal preparation costs.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most