About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-156591 1 (1980-03-31)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadida0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                o 4     \  THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECISlON        .          OF   THE UNITED STATES
                           WASHINGTON. D.C. 20548




FILE:    B-156591                DATE:  March 31, 1980

MATTER OF: Walter A. adeloff - Annual   Leave  Ceiling


DIGEST:    An employee who had a 45 day annual leave
           ceiling left the federal service and received
           a lump sum payment.  Upon re-entry into
           Federal service, three years later, the
           employee's annual leave ceiling is established
           at 30 days since he had used all of his previous
           45 days of annual leave.


   Mr.  Walter A. Radeloff appeals our Claims Division Settlement,
Z-2817694, dated November 15, 1979, which denied his claim to
be given an annual leave ceiling of 45 days upon his reinstatement
with the Government.

   Mr.  Radeloff served overseas from 1959-1962 and thus had
a maximum  annual leave ceiling of 45 days. He transferred
to the United States and served with the Atomic Energy Commission.
At the time of his transfer, Mr. Radeloff's annual leave ceiling
was 45 days and it remained at 45 days until he separated from
the Federal service in 1966. At that time, Mr. Radeloff received
a lump sum payment for his unused annual leave. Mr. Radeloff
re-entered Federal service in 1969 at which time his leave ceiling
was set at 30 days.

   Mr.  Radeloff believes that his leave ceiling should have been
set at 45 days. upon re-entry into Federal service for the following
reasons.  His argument is that lump-sum payment of leave is not
usage as applied by Chapter 630 of the Federal Personnel Manual.
Therefore, since he had never used his annual leave his ceiling
should be set at 45 days. We disagree with Mr. Radeloff's contention.

   After Mr. Radeloff received his lump sum payment in 1966, he
lost his right to have that leave recredited to him as soon as the
period covered by the lump sum expired. See 5 U.S. C. § 6306
(1976)., After the period covered by the lump sum expired, Mr.
Radeloff had received his full entitlement for his annual leave.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most