About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-196053 1 (1980-02-29)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadiau0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



DECISION


FILE:   B-196053


{j ~    ~THE   CDMPTRDLLEP GENERAL~¶L
          OF   THE UNITED STATES
        VVA /S  H ING TON, 0D.   C.  2 05 48
tN  f


DATE:   February 29, 1980


          MATTER OF: Steve Coleman, Jr. -)Claim for Backpay Following
                          Improper Demotion

          DIGEST: 1. Employee of Government Printing Office (GPO), who
                         was improperly demoted from Policeman (First Class)
                         to Printing and Plant Worker (Janitor) and later
                         restored to former position as Policeman, suffered
                         reduction in actual rate of pay upon restoration.
                         Employee seeks to retain higher rate of pay under
                         highest previous rate rule, 5 U.S.C. § 5334(a).
                         However, section 5334(a) does not apply to GPO
                         employees whose positions are not subject to
                         chapter 51 of title 5, United States Code.
                         Employee may not retain higher rate of pay.

                     2.  Employee, who was demoted from Policeman (First
                         Class) to Printing and Plant Worker (Janitor), was
                         restored to former position retroactively upon
                         decision of Federal Employee Appeals Authority.
                         Employee argues that but for improper demotion he
                         would have been promoted to Sergeant. However,
                         absent evidence that he would have been chosen
                         among eligible candidates or that he would have
                         been promoted pursuant to law, regulation, or
                         collective bargaining agreement, he is not entitled
                         to retroactive promotion.

                     3.  Employee, who was improperly demoted and later
                         restored -to former position retroactively, claims
                         backpay during period of demotion. Agency com-
                         puted pay as if improper demotion had not occurred
                         and determined employee's backpay would be less
                         than interim earnings. Employee may retain interim
                         earnings but is not entitled to any backpay. See
                         Warren H. Kummer, B-194777, October 30, 1979.

            This decision is in response to a request from Mr. Stuart A.
       Kirsch, National Representative, Local 2738, American Federation of
_75   -Government Employees, concerning the claim of Mr. Steve Coleman, Jr.,
        an employee of the Government Printing Offi e (GPO), for retention
        of his current rate of pay and a retroactiv) promotion with backpay

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most