About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-192875 1 (1980-01-15)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadhwz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                        -o pTHE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECISIONl                    OF   THE UNITED STATES
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548




FILE:   B-192875                    DATE:   January 15, 1980

MATTER OF:      Reimbursement by Federal agencies for services of
                Civil Service Commission complaints examiners

DIGEST:   Reimbursement to Civil Service Commission for services of
          complaints examiners assigned to conduct discrimination
          complaint hearings for other Federal agencies was a pro-
          per transfer of those agencies' funds pursuant to the
          Economy Act,31 U.S.C. § 686, since it was a necessary
          expense of agency where the complaint arose to provide
          an impartial agency-level hearing on all formal discrim-
          ination complaints.  CSC had no statutory duty to provide
          examiners and did not receive appropriations for the pur-
          pose of doing so.  Assuming that circumstances are essen-
          tially unchanged, same conclusion applies to providing of
          examiners to agencies on reimbursable basis by Equal Em-
          ployment Opportunity Commission, successor to these CSC
          functions.

      TheAssistant Secretary (Administration), Department of the Treas-
 ury (Treasury) has requested the opinion of this Office on whether
 payment by the requesting agency for the services of complaints exam-
 iners employed by the Federal Employee Appeals Authority (FEAA)an   (-
 arm of the Civil Service Commission (CSC), was an illegal augmentation oC
 of CSC's appropriations. We requested and have now received a report  9
 from CSC (now the Office of Personnel Management (OPM)). Based on
 this information and our review of the matter, it is our conclusion
 that reimbursement to CSC for the services of complaints examiners
 was a legal transfer of agency funds. By statute, Executive Order,
 and CSC regulations, each agency of the Federal government was re-
 quired to hold an impartial hearing on all formal discrimination
 complaints. Therefore, it is our view that the cost of providing a
 qualified hearing examiner was a necessary expense of the agency con-
 ducting the hearing, for which its appropriations were available.

      Before continuing, it is important to.note that the Equal Employ-v
 ment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) now oversees the equal employment
 opportunity functions which had been the responsibility of the CSC
 under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and Executive Order
 11478. When the CSC ceased existence on January 1, 1979, many of its
 functions were transferred to OPM and the Merit Systems Protection
 Board (MSPB). However, the equal employment enforcement functions
 within the Federal government, which had been assigned to the CSC
 (42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-16(b) and (c)), were transferred to the Equal

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most