About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-194431 1 (1979-06-08)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadhhk0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 





                              THE   COMPTROLLER GENERAL
 DECISION                   . OF   THE UNITED STATES
                              WASHINGTON, O.C . 20548




 FILE:   B-194431                    DATE:  June 8, 1979

 MATTER OF: Myron D. Starr - De Facto employee

    T:               4~'rt         ,or                   .4-1?'
 DIGEST:     An individual age 15 was appointed to a position      /fre c
             before attaining the minimum age requirement of
             16, and performed the duties of the position for
             139 hours before the error was discovered and
             his employment terminated. The individual was a
             de facto employee, and ma  e com ensated for tHe
                     s~ ervceaa- ta-ly-rd fe~


     The issue presented in this case on a request for an advance
decision from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
p)&whether an individual may be com ensated for a period of work
performed prior to  is meeting the a e requirements for appointment
pursuant to Federal regulations.   e answer is in the affirmative.

     Mr. Myron D. Starr was employed as a student aide by the
Detroit Area Office of HUD on a referral from the Michigan Employ-
ment Security Commission and presentation of a student working
permit.  The Michigan law authorizes employment of persons 14 years
of age and older.  During the period of employment, December 18,
1978, through February 7, 1979, Mr. Starr was 15 years old. Mr. Starr
was appointed to the-Federal position in a special youth program named
the Stay-in-School Campaign, Federal Personnel Manual (FPM) chap-
ter 213, Appendix F (July 1, 1-974). Paragraph 213-F-2a of the FPM
provides that a person may not be appointed in this program unless
he has reached his 16th birthday. Mr. Starr filled an existing
position and performed the duties of that position for 139 hours
before the error in appointment was discovered and his employment
terminated.  There is no indication of any fault by Mr. Starr or
any attempt by him to conceal his age either before or after his
appointment.

     We have long held that a de facto employee may retain
compensation that has been paid to him. 38 Comp. Gen. 175 (1958).
More recently, we have authorized payment of compensation to a
de facto employee after it was ascertained that the employee's
status ,/as that of a de facto employee. 52 Comp. Gen. 700 (1973)
and 55  d. 109 (1975).  In both of these cases, individuals per-
formed services in good faith, under color of authority, but without
a valid appointment.  In each case, at the time of termination, the

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most