About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-192411 1 (1979-03-29)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadhax0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




                               THE  C:OMPTROLLER GENERAL
   D'ECISI     N   .         . OF   THE    UNITED      STATES
                            :WASHINGTON, O. C. 2O54                 4


                                     L96-
  FILE:  B-192411                     DATE:    March 29, 1979

  MATTER OF: Hilldrup Transfer & Storage   Co.


  DIGEST:

1.   United States and carrier may contract independently of tariff
     filed with State regulatory commission although, in absence of
     contract, tariff applies.

2.   Rates and charges in intrastate tariff are otherwise applicable
     within meaning of alternation provision in tender.

3.   Government officers have no authority to contract for interstate
     or intrastate transportation at rates higher than those available
     to the general public for the same or similar services.

     Hilldrup Transfer & Storage Company (Hilldrup) requests review of
deduction action taken in November 1978, by the General Services Adminis-
tration (GSA) to recover an overcharge collected by Hilldrup on a ship-
ment of household goods owned by Captain Joseph G. Raker, USAF. See
49 U.S.C. 66(b)(Supp. V, 1975). The shipment was picked up by Hilldrup's
agent at Key West, Florida, on Government bill of lading No. K-1025376
(GBL) on July 6, 1976, and delivered to Callaway, Florida, on July 12,
1976.

     Freight charges of $2,465.90 were collected by the carrier. They
are derived from Government and Military Rate Tender No. 1-H, I.C.C. No.
35 (Tender 1-H). The overcharge of $494.02 is the difference between
the $2,465.90 collected and freight charges of $1,971.88 derived from
Florida Household Goods Carriers' Bureau Tariff 13, HG-FPSC 13 (Tariff
13) , GSA's audit basis. Most of the overcharge represents a bridge
charge of.$4 per 100 pounds, found in item 150 of Tender 1-H and
applicable to transportation performed through Islamorada, Florida,
and points south and west in the Florida Keys.

     Hilldrup and GSA state that the issue involving GBL K-1025376
is present in similar intrastate Florida shipments transported by Hill-
drup and other carriers.

     Hilldrup contends that the audit action is unfair in the context of
the circumstances surrounding the assessment of the bridge charge on
intrastate traffic traversing the Florida Keys. Hilldrup explains that
without the bridge charge the carrier would have had to transport the
household goods shipment at a loss because the imposition of weight

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most