About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-191588 1 (1979-01-02)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadgtl0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
DECISION





FILE:  B-191588

MATTER OF:


DIGEST:


                2. Employee's vacation was interrupted by his
                   recall'to headquarters for official duty,
                   but there is no authority to pay wife's
                   return travel expenses. Claim for value of
                   lost vacation is analogous to forfeited
                   deposit for which reimbursement may not be
                   made.  Finally, GAO will not object to agency
                   recrediting 18 hours of annual leave incident
                   to long distance telephonecalls and employee's
                   return travel, but employee's claim for recredit
                   of additional 38 hours annual leave representing
                   vacation leave may not be allowed.

     This action is in response to a request from Margaret E.
Wenzel, an authorized certifying officer of the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS), Midwest Region, for an advance decision concerning
the claim of                   ., an IRS employee, for travel and
incidental expenses in the amount of $1,534.73 and for restoration
of 38 hours of annual leave incident to the interruption of his
vacation for the performance of official business.

     The record indicates that         had requested and had
received approval for a period of annual leave from May 13 through
May 27, 1977.  However, on May 12, 1977, Special Agent Bob Zavaglia
advised          that he would be required to appear as a witness
in a criminal tax case on May 23, 1977. When         explained
that he was leaving for Mexico on May 13, 1977, and that he would
be out of the country on the scheduled trial date, Special Agent
Zavaglia and the Assistant U.S. Attorney agreed to allow


             THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
             OF   THE UNITE.D STATES
             WASHINGTON. D. C. 20548




                    CATE:   January 2, 1979

              t--Travel Expenses incident to
interruption of vacation for official duty7

1.  Employee, who left on 2-week vacation in
    Mexico, was ordered to interrupt vacation
    and return to headquarters for official
    duty. Where recall was due to unforeseen
    circumstances and where it would be un-
    reasonable to require employee to assume
    added travel expense, our Office will not
    object to agency reimbursement for employee's
    return travel expenses. See
    B-190755, June 15, 1978.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most