About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-192201 1 (1978-10-11)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadgmp0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                                                 Id




             r                                        THR  COMPTROLLER GRNUITAL
                          DCECISON       J*    I'/  . OF   THE    UNITED      UrATEE
                                                      WASHINGTON, D.C. 90540



                         FILE:   3-192201                   OATH:

                         MATTER OF: Comfort Control, Inc                  OT 11 1978


                         DIGEST:

                               Where bIdder submits lump-nun bid for balancing air system
                               in Pedeial building, but falls to provide a credit for fan
                               sheaves that do not have to be replaced, the absence of the
                               credit does not make bid nonreaponsive since the net cost
                               to the Government can be ascertained.

                               Comfort Control, Inc., protests-the award of a contract to
                          Darwin Construction Co., Inc., for the.balancing of th& air system
                          in building 37 at the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda,
                          Maryland.

                              Bide were solicited under IFB-263-78-B(91)-0100. Two bids
                         were received and opened on April 18, '1978. Darwin submitted a
                         low bid of #89,898. Comfort Control submitted a bid of $103,900,
                         an(,set forth a credit of $131 for each sheave (fan drives) that
                         di  'not have to be replaced. There are 28 sheaves involved. If
                         none of the sheaves have to be replaced, the maximum credit by
                         Comfort Cubtrol would be $3,668. Thus if none of the sheaves
                         need to be replaced, Comfort Control would be paid $100,232, or
                         $10,334 in excess of the low bid submitted by Darwin.

                              Comfort Control contends that the failure of Darwin to
                         provide in its bid a credit 'to the/Government for any sheaves
                         that do not have to be replaced ackes the Darwin bid nonrespon-
                         sive because it does not comply with the provisions of paragraph
                         2.3.4, section 15050 of th& specifications.

                              Paragraph 2.3.4 of section 15050 of the specifications
                         provides:

                              This contractor, with his bid price, shall submitt (sic)
                              a unit price for replacement of the drives. Should the
                              contractor discover that existing fan sheaves, when set
                              at approximately mid-position, will provide the maximum
                              air deliveries, he shall perform tha balancing with exist-
                              ing drives and shall submit proper credit for the sheaves
                              not being replaced.





I


.  I

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most