About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-191028 1 (1978-03-27)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadfuv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 







         14K COMPTROLLE
 ~~~~~ u~J     N IF TT UNTE
     z   JABHINGTON. 0
lift


I


RIZENERAL

         58


FILE:  5-191028


DATE:      Marob 2T(, 1978


MATrER OF: Lovett v. United States - 'nterest on judgment


OIGEET:


Interest on judgment under Federal Tort Claims Act
entered by District Court against United States and
not apposted by United States may not be paid since
interest in such case is precluded by first proviso
of 31 U.S.C. I 724a.


     Lovett v. United. States (Civil No. 74-233-TUC-WCP) was a -wrongful
death action Itreight in the United States District Court for the
District of Arizona  tnder the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.
If 134S(b), 2671 et g.   Judgment was entered for plaintiff
Virginia L. Lovett on Augusc 9, 1977, in the amount of $141,781.38
plus costs.  The judgment further directed the setoff of certain
aiounts which had been paid to plaintiff by the Veterans Administra-
tion (VA) pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 5 351. There was ro mention of
.nterest.  Coats were assessed at $380.92, and the amount paid by
VA vas aetermined to be $13,069.86. The United States did not
appeal and the Department of Justice submitted the judgment to us
2or payment Un November 21, 1977. On Decemubar 8, 1977, our Claims
Division certified thejudgment to the Treasury Department, and a
check in the amount of $129,U92.44 was issued to the plaintiff
shortly thereafter.

     Plaintiff, through her counsel, cit-ing 28 U.S.C. 1§ 1961 and
2411(b), has questioned the correctness 3f our settlement action
in that the check did not include any amount for interest on the
judgment.  For t.he reasons that tollow, we conclude that interest
is not properly payable on this judgment, and that our settlement
action was therefore correct.

     It is undisputed that interest is not recoverable against the
United States except as authorized by statute or contract. United
States v. Maryland ex rel. Mayer, 349 F.2d 693, 694 (D.C. Cir. 1965).
The question thus becomes whether there Is any statutory basis for
the allowance of interest in Lovett.


     Interest on district court judgments i
6 1961, which provides in pertinent part:


authorized by 28 U.S.C.


R


I


I


DEC1BCN


I


i-i.


I

C $No-


I


I

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most