About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-153307 1 (1978-02-15)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadfrz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 






                    / , THE  COMPTROLLUp.P
DECISION . .5         . 0P   THE   UNITE. .
                  t  ~WACHAINGYON. 0.'-*,


FILE:  B-15

MATTER   O


DIGEST:


3307


C./
rAL
iron


DATE: February 15, 1979


F:  Elder L. Gurley - Retroactive Overtime
    Compensation

1.  Employee claimed overtime compensation
    for changing into and out of uniform
    at his residence.  Claim may not be
    paid because changing of uniforms is
    not required to be performed at duty
    station, and the-efore is not compen-
    sable duty.

2.  Civilian quards claimed overtime for
    pre-ihift and post-shift activity.
    Where it is determined that it
    takes GSA guards .3 minutes to obtain
    weapon and proceed to roll call loca-
    tion, while such time is considered
    to be work, it is not compensable
    as overtime as it is so nominal that
    it must be considered within the de
    minimus rule.


     This matter concerns an appeal by Mr. Elder L. Gurley
from a settlement by our Claims Division which denied his
claim for retroactive overtime compensation.

     The record indicates that Mr. Gurley was employed by
the United States Navy as a civilian security guard at the
White Oak Laboratory, Naval Surface Weapons Center, Silver
Spring, Marylahd. On October 30, 1975, our Claims Division
received a claim by Mr. Gurloy and four others for overtime
compensation. Mr. Gurley requested payment pur-suant to the
d'cision of the Court of Claims in Baylor v. United States,
198 Ct. Cl. 331 (1972), for an additional 30 minutes per
day for changing into and out of uniform at his residence,
and 5 minutes per day for drawing 4his weapon and ammunition
and walking to the required place 'for muster and roll call.
The administrative report indicated that the claimants
were not required to  ha1ge into and out of uniform after
reporting to a designated lock-r area. The report con-
cluded that since the employees in fact changed clothes
at their residences, they were not entitled to compensa-
tion for that activity.  With regard to the claim for


IF


           ill.
 I -
I   ______________


I


I


I

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most