About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-190425 1 (1977-12-23)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadfne0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 





                   49F                                         PL 2
                          V THU  COMPTROLLER WENERAL
 DlECIBION       ..a               u      sroa~m
                            DIP  THE UNITEC SITATUE
                 a       CWAU04INGTON. D.C. 2             4a
                     irts*


 PILE:  B-100425                  DATE:   Dember  23, 197

 MATTER   OF:   Business Machine Traders


 DIGEST:

 1. Purchaser of surplus property whose bid price on two
    items was 7. 3 times the current market appraisal and
    four times the next high bid for one item and eight times
    the current market appraisal and 1. 9 times the next high-
    eat bid for the other item may be afforded relief since
    contracting officer was on constructive notice of possi-
    bility of mistake in bid because of substantial disparity
    between erroneous bid and next high bid and because
    successful high bids on similar items were likewise
    inconsistent v !th erronaous bid.

2.  Where bidder shows mistake in bid and intended. bid would
    displace other bidder, relief may be given to amount of
    second high bid since contract has been fully performed
    and rescission is not feasible..

    Invitation for Bids (IFB) 27-7006 was issued by the Defense
Property Disposal Region, Columbus, Ohio. for the sale of
various articles of surplus Government property including
items of office equipment.

    Business Mac.i1ne Tradera (Traders) was the high bidder
on Items 61 and 62., in unit price amounts of $402. 73 for each
respective item. Item 61 consisted of 6 typewriters, w' ile
!tem 62 consisted of 5.. Typewriters contained in each item
were in used, poor condition and were offered on a price per
lot basis. Traders was awarded these items under contract
No. 27-7086-287.

    By letter of January 28, 1977, Traders notified the con-
tracting officer that an error had bieen made in-preparing
the bid for Items 61 and 62 in that 4rhen the bidder inspected
the maahines te manner  in which threy were displayed led him
to assume that the 31 typewriters comprised a single lot.
Accordingly, he intended to bid $402. 79 for 11 typewriters
instead of $402. 79 for Item 61 and $402. 79 for Item 62. No
evidence establishing the intended bid has been submitted.



                                -1-


11

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most