About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-187317 1 (1977-11-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadfkq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
          II




                                         THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL,
             DECIBION        (   :     * OF   THe    UNITED      BTATES           ,
                                         WADHINGTON. D.C. 20340
                                 1r i~


             FILE: B-187?1f                     DATE:   November 30, 1977

             MATTER OF: Navajo Freight Lintes,   Inc., Reconsideration
C)

             DIGEST:

             Where  Section 22 Quotation defines vehicle for application of
             a  per vehicle used rate and carrier did not furnish vehicle
             within  definition, it seems reasonable that overflow provision
             vf  same Quotation would then apply.

             Navajo  Freight Lines, Inc. (Navajo), i. its correspondence of
         April 15, 1977, Navajo Claim No. 049668, requests reconsideration of
         our decision of January 27, 1977, B-187317. In the decision we
         sustained the General Services Administration's (GSA) action in
         disallowing Navajo's claim for refund of freight charges of $1,183.20.
         See 4 C.F.R. 53 (1977).

              GSA's action was taken on a shipment of freight all kinds weighing
         36,720 pounds which was transported ir- September 1972 from West Hartford,
         Connecticut, to Nebo, California, under Government bill of lading (GBL)
         No. F-8825134.  The shipment was picked up on two trailers, a 40-foot
         trailer loaded with 28,440 pounds and a 26-foot trailer loaded with
         8,280 pounds.

              GSA decermined in its audit of transportation charges that the
         lowest rate applicable to the shipment is derived from applying a $6
         xate In Item 2375 of Rouky Mounttuin Tariff Bureau Quotation 19-A
         (Quotation 19-A) to both the 28,440 pounds transported on the 40-foot
         trailer and the 8,280 pounds transported on the 26-foot trailer.

              GSA contended that Item 2375 was nubject to Item 975 of Quotation
         19-A; Navajo contended that it was not. Iten 975 is a so-called
         overflow provision, which provides the basis for rates to be applied
         whitn the freight tendered as one shipment cannot be loaded on one
         vehicle.

              Navajo again statts that Item 2375 contains an exception which
         precludes the application o' Item 975. Navajo contends that:

              * * * recognition be given the encircled 1 of item 2375
              as it Is published with the rate and all provisions of a
              tariff must be acccded consideration with the encircled

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most