About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-189140 1 (1977-11-23)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadfij0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                                     I                               P




                                        TWN  COMPTMCLLUW USNERAL
'      D  ISION *rP THE UNITED WTATEE
                                 N,  1WAS&1INrToN, 0.C, 2o54e
                               tkTE


FILE:       B

MATTER OF:


-190502


DATE:   November 30, 19'f7


Parboil Company


OIGEST:


      Bidder allowed to correct error after opening of
      bids even though corrected bid became lowest bid and
      displaced another bid which had been low since mistake
      and intended hid price um ascertainable from invita-
      tion and bid itself.


      By letter dated October 18, 1977, the General Counsel, General
 Services Administration (GSA), requested an advance decision from
 our Office in connection with GSA's recommendation that Farboil
 Company of Baltimore., Maryland (Parboil), be allowed to correct
 an alleged mistake in item 11a of iti bid submitted in response
 to GSA solicitation No. 1OPR-ZSS-6227.

     The subject solicitatina requested bids for supply require-
ments  for various GSA supply depote for antifouling paint, FSC 8010.
The  supplies were elissified in 16 groups of items and awards were
to be made item-by-item, on the basis'of the Government's estirated
peak mdnthly requirements, the low bidder to be determined by wulti-
plying  the unit price submitted on each item by the estimated
quantity specified and adding the rtsulting exteneions.

     Item ila covered 300 gallons of antifouliug paint, NSN-8010-
00-753-4945, for delivery to Norfolk, Virginia. Opening date
was July 20, 1977, and six bide were received. The apparent
low bid of $152,400 for item 11 was submitted by Seaguard Corporation,
PortsmouTh, Virginia (Seaguard).

     The c>ntractiz  officer states Eiiat subsequent to bid opening
she revien'ed the bids and. concluded hat there existed a possibility
of a mistake in Farboil's bid.  By ietter of July 28, 1977, Farboil
was requested to'.erify its price and' if there was a mistake,
to submit conclusive evidence establishing the validity of the error.
In it. letter of August 1, 1977, Parboil stated that its unit price
for item 11a should have been $15.14, rather than $75.70 as shown
on its bid.  Farboil was again contacted and requested to furnioh



                               -1I-


I..


A


-9-i


I

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most