About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-189350 1 (1977-10-11)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadfej0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                                    I                    I






                                    THE COMrvPTItOLLF1 GENERAL
            DECISION       .         r OF THE U NITED .STATES
                                 /I WASHINGTON. D.C. 2054L83




IV          FILE: B-189350              DATE:  October 11, 1977
C)
            MATTER OF:  Eenjamin Brothers, Inc. (Reconsideration)


            D:GEST.

            1. Request for rvconsideratinn of prior decision is
               dismissed sio;ce It does not present significant
               facts which were not previously considered or
               which would indicate a mistake in fact or law.

           2.  Where agency intends to award contract for
               removat and packing ot 39 fewer line itms than
               tF, 418 line itets listed in solicitation, award
               may be made without revising specifications to
               reflect change bLecause reduction is not so sub-
               atantial as to require negotiations and toLicita-
               ticn permits award of less than all line items
               solicited.


               Benjamin Brothers, Inc. (Benjamin) has requestea
           rec nsideration of our decision Benjamin Brothers Inc.,
           5-109350, August 25, 1977, 77-2 CPD 147. That decision
           involved a request for proposals (RFP) DAAA-25-77-R-
           0012, issued by Frankford Arsenal, U.S. Army for the
           removal and cking  of production equipment from the
           arsenal. The decision held that even though an offeror
           indicates after the closing date for proposals that it
           has not submitted its best price and that it can pro-
           vide monetary savings to the Covernment because of a
           technological breakthrough, the contracting officer,
           nevertheless, may exercise discretion in deciding whether,
           in all of the circumstances, negotiations are required.

               Benjamin states its belief that our interpretation
           of the facts was erroneous but it has provided no details
           which were not previously considered or which would
           indicate that our interpretation of the facts upon which
           the previous decision was based was in error. Thus,
           Benjamin's request has not met the requirements of our
           Bid Protest Procedures, 4 C.FR. 5 20.9 (1976) which
           provide that a request 'or reconsideration shall contain
           a detailed statement of .The factual and legal grounds
           uponi which reversal or modification is deemed warranted.

                                 - 1-





                 KWIII

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most