HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.
![handle is hein.gao/gaobadewp0001 and id is 1 raw text is:
DOCUMENT RESUME
02917 - (A2073159]
(Overtime Compensation for Standby Duty]. b-188025. Jujy 21,
1977. 5 pp.
Decision re: Roy C. Bader; by Robert F. Keller, Deputy
Comptroller General.
Issue Area: Personnel Management and compensation: compensation
(305).
Contact: Office of the General Counsel: Civilian Personnel.
Budget Function: General Government: Central Personnel
Man-'esent (005).
Organization Concerned: Defense Supply Agency.
Authority: Fair Labor Standards Act, as amenaded (29 U.S.C. 201
et seg.). 5 U.S.C. 5545(c) (1). 5 U.S.C. 5542. 5 C.?.!.
550.143(b). H-182207 (1975). B-173899 (1971). B-141846
(1970). Armour and Co. v. antock, 323 U.S. 126, 133 (1944).
Rapp and Hawkins v. United States, 167 Ct. Cl. 852 (1964).
Moss v. United States, 173 Ct. Cl. 1169 (1975).
Lt. Col. D. L. Applegarth, Acting Chief, Accounting ani
Finance Dirision, Defense Supply Agency, requested an advance
decision in connection vith a claim for overtime or premium
compensation foi: hours spent in a staodby status as a
requirement of his job. The employee who was required to be
available by phone was not entitled to premium pay since his
residence had not been classified as his duty station, and his
activities were not so severely limited as to make his standby
duty hcurs compensable under 5 U.S.C. 5545(c) (1). (Author/SC
s.J I](ViewImageLocal?handle=hein.gao/gaobadewp0001&div=1&collection=&method=preview&ext=.png&size=3)