About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-187488 1 (1976-10-22)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadefu0001 and id is 1 raw text is: i.


               Ale                   A  9 b.

                                    u      rTHU COMPTflOLILER GIIPAERAL
 O               E   CI1lON                   OF   THE!   LINfTL13 V   L B TATEf
                                           61WASHINGYON,            . O. 20.546




                FILE:.  1-187488                     DATE:   otober 2N, 1976

       *        MATTER OF;       American Railroad Industriea, Inc,


.       .DIGEST:

                      Where, after award, contractor allegepmistakc  in bid
                      price which was only 7 percent lower than Government
                      estimate and 12 percent lower than next. lowest. bid,
                      such disparities were not so great as to have placed)
                      contracting officer on constructive notice of possibility
                      of mistake and no relief may be granted from valid and
                      binding contratt.


                      American Railroad Industries, Iuc. (ARM) requests relief
                from a mistake in bid, resulting from an error in additon,
                which was not discovered until after it was awarded contract
                No. DAKF23-76-rC-0407. The Government estimate for the railroad
                repairs Involved was 457,497.P.ARI's  bid was $53,339,00; the
                second lowest bid was $60,600.00.

                      Where, as here, a mistake in bid has been alleged after
               award  of contract, this Office may grant roll fonly  If such
               sidtakp  was mutual or if the contracting officer had actual or
               construetive  notice of thearror  prior to award.  45 Comp. Gen. 700,
               706  (1966),  The contracting officer will be charged with construc-
               tiveknowledge   of such error only where the bid price deviates
               sianificantly  from the other bids received or from the Government's
               estimate.,  1-176517, September 6, 1972,  The test is one of
               reasonableness; whether 'under the facts and circumstances of the
               particular  case9 there are,factors whicihcculd have raised the
               presumption  of e rror In tHe mind of the contracting officer.
               Wendet  1/resses, Inc. v. -Jnited States, 170 Ct. Cl. 483, 486
               (1965);i-176772,  May  23, 1973. Generally,  a contracting officer
               has  no reason to suspect error where a low bid is in line with
               other  bid9 received and with the Government estimate.  >-179725,
               Octobcr  30, 1973.

                 . In the instant case, the bid price of ARI was only 7 percent
                 below the Government's estimate and 12 percent below the second
                 lowest bid. We believe that. these differences were not so great

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most