About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-187191 1 (1976-10-13)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadefe0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 








C.            DECISION1. '. OP                   TI-I   UNIT      DO ST'ATED
                                      , WASHINGTON, D.c. 20548

£

              FILE:  B.1387191                     DATE:    Ootober* 13, 1976

              MATTER OF: Rartek Corporation


           .DIGE6T:

                   Protest of award of subcontracts will not be copqidared
                   on merits where it does not appear  that Government per-
                   sonnel were involved in subcontractor selection or  that
                   purchase wan for the Government or  for other reasons
                   set forth in Optimum Systems, Incorporated, 54 Comp, Gen.
                   767 (1975),.


                   Roamtek Corporation (Ramtek) protests the award of two
             subcontrarcts by Singer Company, Simulation Products Division
             (Singer), under Navy contracts Nos. N00019-75-C-0215 and
             N61339-75-C-0112.

                   IT Optimum Systems, Incorporated, 54 Comp, Gen, 767
             (1975), 75-1 CPD 166, our Offf.ce held that we would only con-
             sider protests against the award of oubcontracts by prime
             contractors in certain circumstances,  Basically, theste cir-
             cunstances fall into five categoriess  firt,  where the prime
             contractor is acting as purchasing agent of the Governient;
             second, in cases where the Government's active or direct
             participation in the velection of the subcontractor has the
             net effect of causing or controlling the rejection or selection
             of a potential subcontractor, or has significantly limited sub-
             contract sources; third, where fraud or bad faith in Goverivnent
             -approval of the subcontruct award or propbsed award is shown;
             fourth, where the subcontract award is for an agency of the
             Federal Government; and fifth, where the questions concerning
             the awards of subcontracts are suhmitted by officials of Federal
             agencies who are entitled to advance decislons from'our Office.

                   By letter dated September 2, 1976, we furnished Ramtck a
             copy of Optimum Systems, Incorporated, and requested their views
             whether the protested subcontract awards fell within one of the
             five aium6ratcd situations when we consider prottsts against
             subcontract awards. 'Ramntok responded with blanket allegations
             of (1) involvement of Navy personnel in the procurement process,
             (2) bad faith on the part of the contracting officer and (3)
             Singer acting as the Government's prime purchasing agent under
             one of the protested contracts,  However, Rnntk'offered  no
             expLunatiins or substantiation  in support of its altogaLions,


kw1I-


It

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most