About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-187178 1 (1976-10-07)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadeez0001 and id is 1 raw text is: mm


                                         THE  COMPTkOLLER UENERAL
            DICISION1 .           .7. WTHE     UNITED STATES
       0VWABE.l-IINaTCN.                                      D.c.  2U4S
                                i hll



            FILE:  B-187178                     DOJTE: October     1976

            MATTER OP:       Me sro Machine Corpoiation


            DIGEST:

                 Notwithstanding completion and acceptance of job order
                 under Master Contract for Repair and Alteration of Vessels,
                 contracting officer may set off teasonable estimate of
                 cost of work remaining to be performed under warranty
                 clause, where necessity for such wXrk became apparent prior
                 to presentation for payment of cmnttactor's final invoice.
                 50 Comp. Gen. 263 (1970) distinguished.


                 Metro Machine Coiporation (Metro) has filed a claim Ai
             this Office, requesting payment of $2,590 alleged to have been
             improperly withheld from final payment on Job Order No. 13
             under Hastet Contract for Repcit and Alteration of Vessels,
             N00033-70-C-0032, with the Military Sealift Command (Navy).
             Metro aserts  that the funds were withheld contrary to our
             decision in 50 'omp. Gen. 263 (1970).

                 In that case we held that the Navy could not. withhold final
             payment under contract provisions substantially Identical to
             those involved here, pending expiration of the warranty period.
             In thet regard, we indicated that we were una.'qre of any
             general basis for ruling that an express warran .y in a contract
             excuses or suspends the obligation to make payment after a
             contractor has completed performance. We stated chat:
                                              0
                 * * *when the Government accepts redelivery of
                 the vessel without reservation it is acrinting the
                 contractor's work under the inspection clause
-     .and is presumed to have exercised its rights to
                 inspect that work.

             Consequently, we held that the Government acted improperly in
             refusing to complete final payment when the vessel upon which
             the work was performed was returned without reservation.




                                                 -1-

                  -q


I


A


a

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most