About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-186009 1 (1976-10-12)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaddxz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




                                 &       THE  COMPTROLLER GENEFIAL
            DECISIONrL'TfrU. OF               TH     UN  ITEOM    6TATES
C=                                       VASHINGTON, D. C. va0594B
                               a%



            FILE:   B-186009                    DATE;     October 12, XF176

            MATTER OF:     Jay DP Fitch   Sale or Purchase of Residence


            DIGEST;   Transferred employee may not be reimbursed for
                       ccst o f second appraisrl since only cost of one
                       apprateal may be reimbursed, Also, since
                       necessity for reappraisal arose due to failure
                       to sell residence within 6 months of original
                       appraisal date, claim falls within purview of
                       FTR paras, 2-6.2b and 2-6.2e which prohibit
                       reimburnement.

                 This action is in response to a requesc dated February 25,
            1976, from fis. Orris C, Huet, Authorized Certifying Officer,
            United States Department of Agriculture, for a decision on the
            propriety of certifying for payment a voucher submitted by
            Mr. Jay 9 Fitch, for reimbursement of an appraisal fee paid
            in connection with the sale of his former residence, incident
            to his change of cfficial station,

                 Mr. Fitch has been reimbursed for the cost of an initial
            appraisal of his former residence. However, his claim for
            reimbursement of the cost of a second appraisal was adminis-
            tratively disallowed based on decisions of our Office that the
            cost of only one appraisal may be reimbursed.    47 Comp, Gen, 306
            (1967); B.-179054, September 14, 1973; f-174011, November 15, 1971.
            Hs. Iluet questions the disallowance of this claim since Mr, Fitch
            did not obtain a second appraisal merely to facilitate the sale
            of his house, but did so due to regulations of the U.S. Depart-
            ment of HoUsing and Urban Development * * *,

                The necessity for the second apprainal arose because the
            reoidence was not sold within 6 months of the date uf the original
            appraisai. Department of Housing and Urban Development (lirD)
            Handbook No. 4160.1 (March 1975). The Federal Travel Reguln-
            tions (FPMR 101-7) para. 2-6.2e (May'1973), provide that
            1ijosses due to failure to sell a residence at the old official
            utation * * * at its current appraisal value * * * and any
            similar losses, are not reimbursable. (Emphasisasupplied.)
            Although 'the-amount claimed here is technically not a loss,
            it is an expense that ordinarily results from prices or market


V *

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most