About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-176483 1 (1973-01-26)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaddup0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



               COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
757.                      WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548




   8*176483                                    January 26, 1973



                                                             099   998

   Dear General Robinson:

        We refer to reports dated August 18 and November 14, 1972.
   concerning the protest of Smith & Wesson Electronics Company under
   Request for Proposals (RFP) DSA 400-72-R-6927, issued by the Defense
   General Supply Center on April 6, 1972. for a requirement of electronic
   sirens, Federal Sign and Signal Corporation part number, P15A W/SA-24.
   Although the RFP did not solicit sirens on an or equal basis, it did
   not specifically exclude alternate products from consideration or indi-
   cate that award could not be delayed for testing and approval of other
   manufactuZers' sirens.

        The subject procurement was negotiated under the authority of
   10 U.S.C. 2304(a)(10).  Armed Services Procurement Regulation (ASPR)
   3-210.2 (xiii), which implements that statutory authority, provides
   that purchases and contracts may be negotiated when it is impossible
   to draft, for a solicitation of bids, adequate specifications or any
   other adequately detailed description of the required supplies or
   services.  In this regard, the record shows that on March 17, 1972,
   the contracting officer determined that 4,. was impracticable to obtain
   competition for the sirens by formal advertising, as follows:

                             Findings

       The  Defense General Supply Center proposes to procure
       by  negotiation 250 each, FSN 6350-907-8629 Siren, Elec-
       tronic,  Federal Sign and Signal Corp P/N P15A W/SA-24
       as  authorized by PR S-43283-2067-OH.  The estimated
       cost  of the proposed procurement is $32,250.00.

       The  Air Force has stated that the only acceptable
       item  is Federal Sign and Signal Corp'  P/N FI5A W/SA-24.

       Use  of formal advertising for procurement of the above
       described  equipment is impracticable because it is
       impossible  to draft, for a solicitation of bids, adequate
       specifications  or any other adequately detailed descrip-
       tion  of the equipment.

                          Determination

       The  proposed contract is for property or services for
       which  it is impracticable to obtain competition by for-
                                                            PUBLISHED  DECIED
                                                            .52 C c-=Pm. c

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most