About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-134864 1 (1976-07-27)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaddmg0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
                              THE  COMPTROLLL.A GENERAL
   S(CSI I     1N.OF THE UNITED  STATES
                              WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548



   FILE:                            DATE:    JUL 2796     qy     ios
          B-134864
   MATTER   OF:
                 Edward  E. Herrington - Overtime Compensation
   DIGEST:
             1.  Wage board general mechanic claims over-
                 time compensation for 30 minutes a day
                 since he was not scheduled lunch break and
                 since he allegedly was on call during lunch.
                 Agency states employees were allowed to fix
                 their own 30 minute lunch break for their
                 convenience and employees were specifically
                 told they could leave building for lunch.
                 Moreover  claimant admits he took time off for
                 his lunch breaks. Even assuming employee
                 was on call during lunch breaks, under
                 5 U. S. C. 5 5544 there is no entitlement to
                 overtime compensation for merely being on
                 call during lunch break where no duties are
                 performed.

              2. Employee  claims overtime compensation for
                 having worked 10 days straight on back to
                 back shifts. Employee had Sunday and
                 Monday  off and then worked Tuesday
                 through Saturday. The following week
                 he worked Sunday through Thursday and
                 had Friday and Saturday off. Although
                 employee has worked 10 straight days,
                 since applicable regulations state em-
                 ployee's administrative workweek is
                 Sunday through Saturday, only 5 days
                 work was performed in any one adminis-
                 trative workweek and employee is thus
                 not entitled to overtime compensation.

   This action is in response to Mr. Edward E. Herrington's
appeal of our Transportation and Claims Division Settlement
Certificate, Z-2552994, dated April 4, 1975, which disallowed
his claim for overtime compensation believed due incident to
his employment with the General Services Administration's Public
Buildings Service.

   Mr.  Herrington is employed as a Wage Board, WG-9, general
mechanic at the Dallas Federal Building, 1100 Commerce Street,
Dallas, Texas. The record shows that general mechanics such as

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most