About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-184810 1 (1976-08-20)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaddhc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                       ftj
                 -9o 0       THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECISION                     OF   THE UNITED STATES
                  ,          WASHINGTON. D.C. 20548




FILE:  B-184810                     DATE:  August 20, 1976

MATTER OF: Thomas Construction Company, Inc.--
                Request for Reconsideration

DIGEST:

1.  Where request for reconsideration of GAO decision fails to
    clearly demonstrate errors of fact or law, decision is
    affirmed.

2.  Where bidder protests planned award by grantee and GAO review
    indicates compliance with grant terms, agency regulations and
    applicable statutory requirements, decision that grantee is
    proper authority to determine factual issue of prejudice is
    affirmed.

    Thomas Construction Company, Inc. (Thomas), has requested
reconsideration of our decision Thomas Construction Company, Inc.,
B-184810, October 21, 1975, 75-2 CPD 248. The decision held that
a bid which quoted two sets of unit .prices for use in the admin-
istration of certain contract changes, instead of the single unit
price sought by the solicitation need not be rejected, if acceptance
of the bid would be advantageous to the grantee and would not preju-
dice other bidders.  The low bidder for the work, Universal Construc-
tion Company (Universal), instead of submitting the single set of
prices, for possible changes (either increasing or decreasing the
amount of excavation, concrete, piling or painting work) which
might be ordered during the performance of the contract, submitted
two sets of prices.  One set of Universal's prices was for changes
increasing the work while the other set was for changes decreasing
the amount of work.  The prices in the increase work set were.higher
than those in the decrease work set. Thomas, the second low bidder,
submitted one set of prices applicable to both additions and dele-
tions, as requested by the solicitation.

    Thomas urged that it was prejudiced by the consideration of the
Universal bid to the extent that:

    * * * Universal's bidding enables it to 'maximize
    its chances for gain' on additional work while
    minimizing its 'chances for loss on a reduction in
    quantity,' thereby negating the risk inherent in
    relying on a single unit price for changes in the
    required work.  Thomas Construction Company, Inc.,
    supra.


- 1 -

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most