About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-187022 1 (1976-09-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadczj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
                              THE  COlVIPTROLLAR GENERAL
 DECISIO       l              OF   THE    UNITED      STATES
                              WASHINGTON, 0.C. 2O548




 FILE:      B-187022                 DATE:  September 14, 1976

 MATTER OF:      Hugh Brasington Contracting Company


 DIGEST:

     Dispute arising under contract between contractor
     and contracting officer as to performance require-
     ments must be pursued under contract Disputes clause
     procedure.


     This matter concerns a request by Hugh Brasington Contracting
Company (Brasington) that our Office intervene in a dispute which
has arisen under contract No. DACA21-75-C-0148 with the United States
Army Corps of Engineers, Savannah, Georgia. The disagreement revolves
around the interpretation of certain clauses in the contract as to
which party will furnish certain kitchen equipment.

     The authority of our Office does not include intervention
between a contractor and a contracting agency for the purpose of
resolving a dispute rising under a contract. That is a matter for
settlement pursuant to the procedures set out in the Disputes clause
which is contained in standard Government contracts. Those procedures
provide for a decision by the contracting officer, with the contractor
having a right of appeal from the decision to the head of the agency
concerned.  Both the contractor and the Government are bound to follow
the procedure set out in the contract for the administration of dis-
putes arising out of the contract, and the contractor must exhaust its
administrative remedies under the Disputes clause before appealing
to the courts.  E. P. Reid, Inc., B-183172, March 7, 1975, 75-1 CPD
141.

     Furthermore, it should be noted that as a result of S&E Contrac-
 tors, Inc. v. United States, 406 U.S. 1 (1972), our Office no longer
 reviews decisionsrendered under the Disputes clause. In that case,
 the United States Supreme Court held that, absent bad faith or fraud,
 a final agency settlement or decision, rendered under the Disputes
 clause, is not subject to further administrative review.





                               - 1-



I7

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most