About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-185027 1 (1976-09-22)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadcyk0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

A



                                     THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
        DECISION                     OF   THE    UNITED      STATES
                                     WASHINGTON, D. C. 20548




        FILE:   B-185027                    DATE:   September 22, 1976

        MATTER OF:      Dynalectron Corporation


        DIGEST:

        1.    Reduction in evaluation of proposal which relied on employ-
              ment and education histories to satisfy character require-
              ment of RFP was reasonable since RFP contained explicit
              requirements for evidence of character.

        2.    Proposal which listed only 5 of 14 temporary hires required
              by RFP was reasonably evaluated where credit was given only
              for five hires listed in spite of protester's allegation
              that-there was no doubt of its ability to furnish manpower.

        3.    Although decision to include only one proposer within com-
              petitive range is subject to close scrutiny, agency deter-
              mination will be upheld where it involves neither close
              question of proposal acceptability, likelihood of significant
              cost savings nor easily corrected deficiencies.

        4.    Technically unacceptable offer may be rejected even though
              that proposal offers lower cost than technically acceptable
              offer chosen for award.


              Dynalectron Corporation (Dynalectron) protests the award of
        a cost-plus-fixed-fee contract to Serv-Air, Inc. under the U.S.
        Customs Service (Customs) Request for Proposals (RFP) BC-76-1.
        The RFP solicited offers from potential contractors for flight-
        line and depot level maintenance for Customs aircraft located at
        seven primary maintenance sites throughout the United States.
        Dynalectron alleges that the Government failed to evaluate its
        proposal in accordance with the provisions of the RFP and acted
        in an arbitrary and capricious manner in conducting that evalua-
        tion.  The protester also implies that the evaluation process was
        improper since only one proposer was determined to be within the
        competitive range and that Dynalectron should have been considered
        for award since its proposed cost-plus-fixed-fee was lower than
        Serv-Air's.

              Customs had previously solicited offers for similar
        aircraft maintenance services earlier in 1975 under RFP BC-75-B.
        The award to Kay & Associates unter that solicitation was pro-
        tested by Dynalectron.  Customs terminated the contract for the
        convenience of the Government and instituted the present procurement.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most